{"@context":{"CIP100":"https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm","body":{"@id":"CIP100:body","@context":{"references":{"@id":"CIP100:references","@container":"@set","@context":{"GovernanceMetadata":"CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference","Other":"CIP100:OtherReference","label":"CIP100:reference-label","uri":"CIP100:reference-uri","referenceHash":{"@id":"CIP100:referenceHash","@context":{"hashDigest":"CIP100:hashDigest","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm"}}}},"comment":"CIP100:comment","externalUpdates":{"@id":"CIP100:externalUpdates","@context":{"title":"CIP100:update-title","uri":"CIP100:uri"}}}},"authors":{"@id":"CIP100:authors","@container":"@set","@context":{"name":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name","witness":{"@id":"CIP100:witness","@context":{"witnessAlgorithm":"CIP100:witnessAlgorithm","publicKey":"CIP100:publicKey","signature":"CIP100:signature"}}}}},"authors":[],"body":{"comment":"I voted No, not because I'm against this particular proposal, but because I'm against this kind of proposal in general. In my opinion, proposals like this clearly don't reduce bureaucracy or make governance more efficient. To be honest, I genuinely don't understand what exactly we're supposed to vote for here? For everything good and against everything bad? I really couldn't find anything specific here to actually vote for. Please point me in the right direction if I incedently overlooked it.\n\nFurther, if we look at this proposal specifically - on the one hand, it only describes very broad concepts, but on the other hand, it already defines KPI levels and similar metrics. Yet there's no explanation of how it's actually supposed to be implemented. For example - where does the number 200M come from? Of course, I wouldn't mind Cardano generating 200M. But I'd be even happier if it generated 400M or 800M. So should I vote Yes for 200M, or No? I just don't get it.\n\nInitially, I was going to vote Abstain, since that seemed to reflect my position most accurately. However, I later reconsidered - the only reasonable approach I see toward this and similar proposals is not to vote for them at all. But since I wanted to leave a comment, I had to cast a vote - and No here effectively equals not voting at all."},"hashAlgorithm":"blake2b-256"}