{"@context":{"CIP100":"https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm","body":{"@id":"CIP100:body","@context":{"references":{"@id":"CIP100:references","@container":"@set","@context":{"GovernanceMetadata":"CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference","Other":"CIP100:OtherReference","label":"CIP100:reference-label","uri":"CIP100:reference-uri","referenceHash":{"@id":"CIP100:referenceHash","@context":{"hashDigest":"CIP100:hashDigest","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm"}}}},"comment":"CIP100:comment","externalUpdates":{"@id":"CIP100:externalUpdates","@context":{"title":"CIP100:update-title","uri":"CIP100:uri"}}}},"authors":{"@id":"CIP100:authors","@container":"@set","@context":{"name":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name","witness":{"@id":"CIP100:witness","@context":{"witnessAlgorithm":"CIP100:witnessAlgorithm","publicKey":"CIP100:publicKey","signature":"CIP100:signature"}}}}},"authors":[],"body":{"comment":"I find the Info action step adds unnecessary delays and confusion, given that 67% approval is already required at the final vote. But since it's now a mandatory part of the process, I'm voting Abstain just to let it proceed - the actual decision will be made at the final vote. It's worth noting that I voted Yes on this proposal earlier, for the reason mentioned above. However, after several discussions within the team and with other DReps, I came to the conclusion that Abstaining is the more appropriate option in this case. A Yes vote might create the false impression that I fully support the proposal, which isn't necessarily true. I simply don't want to take part in the preliminary vote, but at the same time I don't want the default No from non-voting DReps to negatively affect the proposal."},"hashAlgorithm":"blake2b-256"}