{"@context":{"CIP100":"https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm","body":{"@id":"CIP100:body","@context":{"references":{"@id":"CIP100:references","@container":"@set","@context":{"GovernanceMetadata":"CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference","Other":"CIP100:OtherReference","label":"CIP100:reference-label","uri":"CIP100:reference-uri","referenceHash":{"@id":"CIP100:referenceHash","@context":{"hashDigest":"CIP100:hashDigest","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm"}}}},"comment":"CIP100:comment","externalUpdates":{"@id":"CIP100:externalUpdates","@context":{"title":"CIP100:update-title","uri":"CIP100:uri"}}}},"authors":{"@id":"CIP100:authors","@container":"@set","@context":{"name":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name","witness":{"@id":"CIP100:witness","@context":{"witnessAlgorithm":"CIP100:witnessAlgorithm","publicKey":"CIP100:publicKey","signature":"CIP100:signature"}}}}},"authors":[],"body":{"comment":"This is one of the two budget proposals (the second one is 'Ecosystem Exchange Listing and Market Making service pool') I initially voted Abstain on, based on the previously mentioned approach - I was unable to determine whether the potential benefit to the ecosystem would outweigh the amount requested from the treasury.\\n\\nHowever, after careful consideration and weighing all the pros and cons, I came to the conclusion that although exchange listings and other activities described in the proposal are unlikely to directly increase the ADA price (as we've seen many times recently that this doesn't tend to happen), they will likely have a positive long-term impact on the ecosystem. This would come through greater brand recognition, improved user experience through easier access to native stablecoins on centralized exchanges, and so on.\\n\\nSo, in the end, I decided to change my vote to Yes."},"hashAlgorithm":"blake2b-256"}